With the skyrocketing popularity of golf launch monitors, everyone is looking for a suitable device for their practice. However, it could be a daunting task given the overflowing number of brands offering high-end models and impressive performances. What is more confusing is that you can now have premium quality launch monitors at an affordable price. So, budget is not a hindrance anymore. Having said that, there is a long list of criteria that you must check out before you invest your hard-earned money into one of these. 

While choosing a personal golf launch monitor, many home golfers recommend Uneekor QED. On the other hand, GC2 Golf Launch Monitor is also a leading choice. Both these launch monitors have exceptional game improvement features as well as stunning performance. There is no wrong choice if you settle for either of these. However, there are certain differences between these two launch monitors which could be crucial in satisfying your individual needs. Therefore, to help you choose, we have compiled a side-by-side comparison between Foresight Sports GC2 and Uneekor QED.


Both Foresight Sports GC2 and QED use photometric sensors to track the swing through impact. This means that the launch monitors use high-speed photometric cameras and capture every movement of your club and golf ball. Further, they put together and analyze the images to calculate the shot metrics and yield comprehensive shot data using advanced algorithms. As per tests and expert reviews, both launch monitors are at par in terms of accuracy. 

Uneekor QED, however, offers some cool technology that FS GC2 does not. For example, QED gives you real-time shot data through impact. This video footage can also be replayed in slow motion, which is a great way to review and improve your techniques. The fundamental difference between these two launch monitors is how you set them up. QED is an overhead mount launch monitor, whereas you’ll have to place GC2 in front of you on the mat.  

Foresight Sports’ GC2 launch monitor


Both launch monitors provide the complete array of ball data. However, you will need the Head Measurement Technology (HMT) add-on with the GC2 to get the club data. QED, on the other hand, provides both ball and club data without any add-on.  


For both QED and GC2, the features depend on which software you use with the launch monitor. QED supports a variety of game analysis and simulator software like TGC 2019, E6 Connect, and World Golf Tour. It also gives you some helpful visuals such as swing path video, ball tracker, etc. that you cannot get from GC2.  

For GC2, however, the only available software option is FSX 2020. You will have to pay a yearly subscription to access the service. 

Final Verdict

GC2 performs well both indoors and outdoors. But you can use QED only for indoor practice. Given the fact that GC2 and QED fall in the same price category, it ultimately boils down to the purpose. So, choose according to your requirements.